The AMD isn't 8 center. that's unquestionably 4 center with 4 digital cores, comparable because of the fact the i5. in basic terms distinction is the way they describe it. AMD have constantly while in comparison with Intel a similar way. they are fairly swifter yet alot warmer and means hungry. Intels are curiously greater reliable (despite the fact that I ran an AMD song rig for 8 years with out issues) I at the instant run an i7 2600k gadget for video enhancing and the chip is dazzling, i do no longer actually have a pics card. (i exploit the i7 in-built pics, no longer an decision for gaming) i'd propose the Intel.
anonymous
2011-10-12 05:06:59 UTC
Like the other said FX-8150 is huge failure. It is even worse than older Phenom II in some cases
magzcampos_363
2011-10-15 01:11:29 UTC
amd isnt a huge failure lmao, IPC isnt everything.
people thought too highly of FX, it was never meant to destroy core i7, if you look at the benchmarks, and not just from 1 review site, youll see it does fairly well were it was suppose to. biggest drawback is power consumption for people,
at microcenter the FX 6100 is heavily discounted :D
Ella
2011-10-11 23:31:35 UTC
AMD Bulldozer FX 8150 was just released, and here is the Bulldozer FX 8150 reiew. http://drivers.downloadatoz.com/tutorial/28323,amd-bulldozer-fx-8150-processor-debuts-and-review-features-and-price.html Hope it can help you.
Ken
2011-10-12 18:50:57 UTC
So wanted this chip to be great for AMD, but it's only so-so.
Barely able to keep pace with the i5 2500k, and not at all as good as the 2600k.
Just sad.
?
2011-10-12 00:37:06 UTC
lol it is
ⓘ
This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.